I disabled the PCV valve on this vehicle by filling the PCV valve with JB Weld, allowing that to harden overnight then reinstalling just as it was. The results were better acceleration and increased mileage. These were observed and not measured, so no numbers to share. My daughter also drives this vehicle and I did not tell her of the mods or to expect any differences. Without being asked, she spoke up to say that, "The car takes off better than before." As far as mileage, we have both observed fewer fill ups. I would guess the milage gain to be up to 3mgp.
The PCV system is an EPA mandated (for the manufacturer) tech that actively draws vapors from the crankcase and into the intake. The idea is that the vapors are burned with normal combustion rather than escaping into the atmosphere. This system uses engine vacuum and therefore decreases engine vacuum. Engine vacuum is critical to efficiency. The PCV system neccessarily decreases engine efficiency. Moreover, the PCV system introduces water vapor into the crankcase which contaminates engine oil thus reducing oil performance and life. Which is better: Decreasing efficiency to mitigate pollution or increasing efficiency to produce less pollution? Also, with more available tourque, would one not need to use less throttle?
A concern expressed by some is that without the PCV system, vapors accumulate and build positive pressure within the crankcase resulting in stress to the oil seals. This is absolutely impossible as all engines have passive vents, usually located in the intake between the air filter and throttle body. So, whatever vapors need to vent, still make thier way into the intake but without robbing precious vacuum.
Provided that the PCV valve is easily accessible on a given vehicle, this is the easiest and cheapest mid-yield mod that one can do.