Thanks, Dan and Nick, for your suggestions.
Regarding the PVC valve on the little Metro: there's only one breather tube from the valve cover, which T's off, one arm going straight back to the air cleaner housing, one arm going down to the PVC valve. I turned the T around, blocked off the end going down to the PVC valve, then, leaving the PVC valve in place, plugged it by fitting a vacuum cap over the opening. Noticed an immediate increase in engine efficiency.
I had previously installed a PVC "enhancer" in the hose leading to the air cleaner, an air compressor filter with a few marbles in it to help condense the water. This worked fine (but didn't on several other vehicles, as it increased the pressure in the crankcase to where it forced oil out)--collected much water and crud. I think it worked OK on the Metro because the PVC valve (which was not in the the filter loop, allowed the release of the pressure. But with the PVC valve no longer operative, oil began to be forced out the oil cap, so I removed the filter. Sure wish there was a way to utilize a filter though, I really liked the concept of removing water and crud from the blowby gasses before going back into the intake system.
Also tried two other things:
Installed an HHO system from the Mileage Shop, and used their recommended means of re-educating the ECU to account for the difference in the Oxygen (described in a previous post), and removed the oxygen sensor extender.
Installed a MAP enhancer--enables variable manual control of the voltage going from the MAP sensor to the ECU. Pretty neat to watch (on a Scan Gauge) the MPG climb as I lean out the fuel. Also found that different driving situations require different settings: driving uphill requires almost no lean; coasting down hill I can lean it out to where the MPG reaches over 900 MPG, though it chances stalling the engine; driving on the level I can lean it to where the MPG is over 60, at 60 MPH.
Seems to work well. Took a 70 mile round trip with an hour wait between trips. The return trip seemed to have even better results than the out trip, but averaged 57.7 MPG with everything working. Of course, I need to check that against the actual fuel usage at the pump for accuracy--still have yet to do that. Will be taking a 700 mile round trip this weekend, will be curious to see if results remain, wax or wane. Will post.
Set the Scan Gauge to read fuel trims at S and L, but still mystified at how to read the results. Though the readings vary depending on the driving situations, the L is always less than the S. At a steady 60 MPH on the level, S is at 20, L is at 0. ???