Well.. I've always thought that Subaru's were Different, maybe a little Weird. I mean for instance, who else used to stick the spare tire atop the engine...?
Re: insulating the exhaust system, well again the folks who put the Pleadies on their logo, did it their own way. My '02 Outback has 3 cat. converters. But, BOTH O2 sensors are on the forward most-upstream cat...?!
Looking downstream at the other two cats, there is a big round opening in the metal heat shield over those two cats. To me that looks like an access hole where maybe some models had the electrical wiring go thru to the downstream cat(s). Why else put that big hole there, it's not like ya needed access to the Catalytic Converter Fill Plug or anything. But on my Outback at least, that hole in the heat shield has no reason to be there.
Meanwhile they stuck the upstream O2 right at the entry end of the upstream cat, then they stuck the downstream O2 at the output end OF the Same Cat. The 2 O2's are a foot apart on the same upstream cat. Then there's 2 more cat's downstream, a short resonator and on out to the muffler/tailpipe.
It's all OEM stuff in good outward appearance, like the rest of the car.
Man, I was looking forward to trying this neat trick of insulating the exhaust to bring up temp's to the downstream O2 sensor. But I just don't think there is a reasonable method of this on this car. I'm not gonna try to insulate that upstream cat...

uh-uh!
And actually, I guess I need to look into just what strategy Subaru uses re: engine and emissions control management for my Outback. There doesn't appear to be any kind of sensor on/in the air inlet tract, just ducting and an air filter. IT has the usual TPS sensor and IAC valve on the TB. It has temp sensors on the engine, and what must be a MAP sensor on the intake plenum. There is a switch/valve in the fuel vapor line, then that hose integrates into the IAC setup.
I've already re-routed the PCV and crankcase breather hoses. And it has the 2 O2's on the upstream cat so close together they can pass notes in class. Far as I yet know, that's it.
So far on this car, the Groove/IAC/PCV mods along with the initial RVS engine oil treat. have yielded a big change in driveability, and hot air at the tailpipe once it's driven and all warmed up.
MPG's on the other hand- I did my usual 50 mile "Orange teat" between Fernley and Fallon one night a few weeks back, and saw no improvement at all. But I'm not completely sure on that. The first time I tried filling the tank all the way up the filler neck, the engine bucked and had issues for a short while. I think that liquid gas got into the fuel vapor management system, and causes those hiccups. In subsequent fillups, I've avoided filling it to the brim, stopping instead after a couple click-off's of the nozzle.
This car has no onboard display of MPG's. So it falls to paper/pencil, an accurate duplicate-able gas tank fill method, and a test drive route with as few variables as possible. It's the tank fill method that I question now. I'm not yet really used to the way this tank acts when I get real close to completely full. When you need to get it spot-on, to be able to fill it to within ounces of gas volume each time, then even how you park at the pump (I use the same pump, shooting for the exact same parking stance) and even the pump pressure can be important variables. The last main variable- is just exactly WHEN you decide it's full. On this 50 mile run, a 10'th of a gallon of gas really means something, see?
Despite all this- I do hope that the rest of you will try the exhaust insulation method to increase temp's for the downstream O2's. It's a simple method, and if we can get some proof's of it documented, well then it's another tool in the Gadgetman Arsenal!
Tracy G[color=][/color]